Editorial Policy

1. Mission & editorial values

Our mission is to provide accurate, accessible, and compassionate health information that helps readers navigate complex health decisions with confidence. We aim to break down medical topics in a way that is easy to understand, free from unnecessary alarm, and respectful of all lived experiences—in other words, guidance you can actually use.

2. Our editorial promise

We write the way we wish every health care experience felt—clear, honest, and genuinely helpful. Whether we’re breaking down a confusing bill or explaining a medical breakthrough, our content is built on a few non-negotiables:

• We tell the truth, plain and simple: If something’s broken in the system, we name it. No jargon, no sugarcoating, no fluff.
• We cut through the noise: Our job is to help you make smart decisions faster. That means clear answers, actionable guidance, and no wasted words.
• We lead with humanity: Health care can be overwhelming, and we don’t add to the stress. We use inclusive, affirming language and meet every reader with empathy and respect.
• We stay focused on what matters: Our content reflects the real-world experiences of diverse patients and caregivers—and always points you toward the next best step.

3. Content standards

Evidence-based accuracy

All health content is rooted in current, peer-reviewed research and expert-reviewed sources. We reference reputable publications, government health organizations, and accredited institutions to ensure accuracy and credibility.

Subject matter experts

We also speak directly with subject matter experts (physicians, specialists, and clinical researchers) to provide timely, real-world insights and the most current understanding of the topic.

Rigorous review process

If applicable, our content undergoes a structured review process for accuracy, completeness, and tone. Editors collaborate closely with qualified healthcare professionals (MDs, nurse practitioners, PhDs, etc.) as medical reviewers and fact-checkers with relevant expertise to uphold our editorial standards.

Regular updates

We aim to review and update our articles periodically to reflect evolving medical knowledge and guidelines.

4. Sourcing & citations

Source integrity

We reference only reputable and up-to-date sources, such as peer-reviewed journals, academic institutions, and government health agencies. We avoid anonymous or unreliable sources, and prioritize human studies unless noted otherwise.

Citation practices

Sources are cited clearly within the article or in a reference section at the end, allowing readers to easily verify the information provided.

5. Corrections & updates

If any errors or outdated recommendations are discovered, they are corrected promptly through our review process. Our editorial team maintains a proactive schedule to ensure all content reflects the latest standards in medical research, clinical guidelines, and public health understanding.

We welcome reader feedback to continuously improve the accuracy and relevance of our content. Readers may contact hello@generalmedicine.co with corrections or suggestions.

6. Legal notices & disclaimers

Medical disclaimer

The content published by General Medicine is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

AI or ghostwriting use

Some content may be created or edited using AI-assisted tools or contracted writers. Our editorial team and medical reviewers review all final content to ensure accuracy, consistency, and alignment with our editorial standards.

7. Copyright & ownership

All editorial content is the property of General Medicine and may not be reproduced, distributed, or republished without written permission.

8. Continuous improvement

Our editorial standards evolve with the science—and with you. As clinical guidelines change and patient needs shift, we commit to revisiting and improving our content and process. We listen to feedback, track updates in research, and stay flexible so our guidance can stay relevant.